GitPython: Git.ls_remote accepts ext:: URLs without check_unsafe_protocols (RCE under permissive git transport policy); merge_base / IndexFile.move lack check_unsafe_options - residual gaps of the 24439/67323 hardening rollout
What fixes it
No source in this snapshot names a fixed version.
Description
Summary
GitPython has spent 2022-2026 rolling out two reusable guards method-by-method: Git.check_unsafe_protocols(url) (raises UnsafeProtocolError for <transport>:: remote-helper URLs - CVE-2022-24439) and Git.check_unsafe_options(...) (raises UnsafeOptionError for denylisted option spellings - CVE-2023-40267, CVE-2026-42215, CVE-2026-67323). Three wrapper methods that build a git argv from caller-controlled values still have neither:
- **
Git.ls_remote** (git/cmd.py:1128-1143) - checks options (:1139-1141) but forwards the URL positional unchecked; noallow_unsafe_protocolsparameter exists. The same URL throughclone_fromraisesUnsafeProtocolError. - **
Repo.merge_base** (git/repo/base.py:895-936) - forwards**kwargs/*revtoself.git.merge_basewith no guard; guarded siblingiter_commitssits 12 lines up. Its exception handler additionally swallows every non-128GitCommandErrorinto[], masking the injection. - **
IndexFile.move** (git/index/base.py:1092-1168) - forwards**kwargstogit mvtwice (:1147, :1167); guarded siblingremove()is 23 lines above.
Verified unfixed on main @ a54d159 (2026-09-21), post-dating latest release 3.1.62 (2026-09-07) - all three sites re-verified today.
Impact
**Site 1 (ls_remote)** - RCE conditional on the victim git transport policy. The common 'probe first, then clone' pattern (Git(...).ls_remote(attacker_url)) with an ext::sh -c ... URL executes arbitrary commands when the victim git permits the ext transport: dynamically verified with protocol.ext.allow=always (marker executed). git >= 2.38.1 stock config refuses the transport (fatal: transport 'ext' not allowed, rc 128) - GitPython adds no defense-in-depth and surfaces a bare GitCommandError. Environments on git < 2.38.1 are exposed with stock config - the exact population CVE-2022-24439 was scored against.
Sites 2/3 - latent argument-injection surface: caller kwargs flow 1:1 into the git argv before operands and -- (cmd.py:1850 opt_args + ext_args), and execute_kwargs (incl. shell=True/env - the CVE-2023-40267 Windows mechanism) passes through unguarded. Today git merge-base/git mv expose no exec option, so we claim the missing-guard class (vendor-settled by CVE-2026-67323, which bundled archive/ls_remote/iter_commits/blame in one advisory), not direct RCE.
Dynamic verification (today; GitPython main @ a54d159, git 2.55.0, Linux)
| # | Call | Result | |---|---|---| | T1 | repo.git.ls_remote('ext::/tmp/gp_touch.sh'), stock config | git refuses (rc 128); **no UnsafeProtocolError from GitPython** | | T1b | same + victim config protocol.ext.allow=always | marker created - arbitrary command executed | | T2 | repo.git.ls_remote('.', upload_pack=...) | blocked by cmd.py:1141 (options-side fixed - protocol-side is the residual gap) | | T3 | repo.merge_base('main','side', upload_pack=...) | not blocked; argv git merge-base --upload-pack=... main side; rc 129 silently converted to [] | | T4 | repo.index.move(['f1','f2'], output=...) | not blocked; option reaches git mv (rc 129) |
Coverage matrix (main @ a54d159)
check_unsafe_protocols: 7 call sites (_clone, archive, set_url, create, fetch, pull, push) - none on ls_remote. check_unsafe_options: 24 call sites incl. ls_remote, iter_commits, IndexFile.remove - absent on merge_base and move.
Precedents (same repo, same guard family)
- CVE-2022-24439 / GHSA-hcpj-qp55-gfph (critical):
check_unsafe_protocolson the clone path - Site 1 is the sameext::primitive on a sibling API. - CVE-2023-40267 / GHSA-pr76-5cm5-w9cj (critical, 'incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439'):
check_unsafe_options- unguarded kwargs to argv treated as RCE (shell=Trueon Windows). - CVE-2026-42215 / GHSA-rpm5-65cw-6hj4 (high, fixed 3.1.47): underscored-spelling bypass - rollout still active in 2026.
- CVE-2026-67323 / GHSA-956x-8gvw-wg5v (high, 8.4, fixed 3.1.51): added
check_unsafe_optionstoarchive/ls_remote/iter_commits/blame; its PoC is literallyrepo.git.ls_remote('.', upload_pack=...). Establishes that a wrapper missing the check is itself a vulnerability. This report is the residual gap of that rollout:ls_remotegot options but not protocols;merge_base/movegot neither.
Recommended fix (existing helpers, 1-3 lines per site)
Git.ls_remote:if not allow_unsafe_protocols: self.check_unsafe_protocols(args[0])+ newallow_unsafe_protocols: bool = False(the_clonepattern, base.py:1536-1538).Repo.merge_base:check_unsafe_options(Git._option_candidates(list(rev), kwargs), unsafe_options=self.unsafe_git_revision_options)(theiter_commitspattern); stop masking non-128 statuses.IndexFile.move: theremove()pattern withunsafe_git_pathspec_from_file_options.
One advisory, three affected methods, severity anchored on Site 1 - mirroring CVE-2026-67323's bundling.
Text from GitHub Advisory Database
Affected versions 1
- GitPython, pip<= 3.1.62GitHub