All vulnerabilities
GHSA-w2ch-4xgr-22wwGO-2026-6754

code.vikunja.io/api: Vikunja: Task relation deletion does not check read access to the other task, allowing cross-project relation removal

code.vikunja.io/apigoLibraries & packages
CVSS
2.3Low
ExploitationNo known exploitationNot in CISA KEV, which does not prove it is unexploitedCISA KEV
Exploit odds (EPSS)No scoreNo FIRST EPSS score in this snapshot yet
Fixed in2.6.0Fixed versionGitHub
Published9 Oct 2026Updated 19 Oct 2026GitHub

What fixes it

  • 2.6.0code.vikunja.io/api, goGitHubgo get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.6.0
  • 2.6.0code.vikunja.io/api, GoOSVgo get code.vikunja.io/api@v2.6.0

A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.

Description

Summary

Deleting a task relation only requires write access on the base task. Unlike relation creation, it does not verify that the caller can read the other task. A user with write access to one project can therefore delete relations whose other end lives in a project they have no access to. Since the delete removes both the forward and inverse rows, the relation also disappears for the other project's members.

Details

TaskRelation.CanCreate (pkg/models/task_relation_permissions.go:32-52) requires write access on TaskID and read access on OtherTaskID.

TaskRelation.CanDelete (pkg/models/task_relation_permissions.go:25-29) only checks Task{ID: rel.TaskID}.CanUpdate(s, a); OtherTaskID is never authorized.

TaskRelation.Delete (pkg/models/task_relation.go:314-354) then deletes both the (task_id, other_task_id, kind) row and its inverse, so the relation is removed from the far task as well.

Affects DELETE /api/v1/tasks/{id}/relations/{kind}/{otherTaskId} and the equivalent v2 endpoint.

Impact

Low, integrity only. An authenticated user holding write permission on a shared project can remove task relations that link into projects they cannot read. No data is disclosed and no privilege is gained; the attacker cannot recreate the relation. The far project's owner sees the relation vanish without indication of who removed it.

Preconditions: the attacker has write access to a project containing a task that is already related to a task in a project they cannot access.

Proof of Concept

  1. As owner, create project P_near with task near and project P_far with task far.
  2. Share P_near with attacker at write permission (permission: 1). Do not share P_far.
  3. As owner: PUT /api/v1/tasks/{near}/relations with {"other_task_id": far, "relation_kind": "related"} -> 200.
  4. As attacker: GET /api/v1/tasks/{far} -> 403 (confirms no access).
  5. As attacker: PUT /api/v1/tasks/{near}/relations with the same body -> 403 (create path is enforced).
  6. As attacker: DELETE /api/v1/tasks/{near}/relations/related/{far} -> 200 "Successfully deleted."
  7. As owner: GET /api/v1/tasks/{far} -> related_tasks is now empty.

Reproduced against vikunja/vikunja:2.5.0.

Recommended Fix

Make CanDelete mirror CanCreate: after checking CanUpdate on the base task, also require CanRead on OtherTaskID.

Text from GitHub Advisory Database

Affected versions 2

  • code.vikunja.io/api, go>= 0.9, <= 2.5.0GitHub
  • code.vikunja.io/api, Gofrom 0.9, fixed in 2.6.0OSV

References 5