All vulnerabilities
GHSA-vp88-798v-h67fRUSTSEC-2026-0347

rustls: ECH rejection can expose buffered application data to authenticated outer server before `ech_required` alert

rustlsrustLibraries & packages
CVSS
2.3Low
ExploitationNo known exploitationNot in CISA KEV, which does not prove it is unexploitedCISA KEV
Exploit odds (EPSS)No scoreNo FIRST EPSS score in this snapshot yet
Fixed in0.23.46Also 0.24.0-dev.2GitHub
Published27 Oct 2026Updated 27 Oct 2026GitHub

What fixes it

  • 0.23.46rustls, rustGitHub
  • 0.24.0-dev.2rustls, rustGitHub
  • 0.23.46rustls, crates.ioOSVcargo update -p rustls --precise 0.23.46
  • 0.24.0-dev.2rustls, crates.ioOSVcargo update -p rustls --precise 0.24.0-dev.2

A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.

Description

In rustls 0.23.44 and 0.23.45, application data that a client buffers before the handshake completes is sent to the server even when the server rejects Encrypted Client Hello (ECH).

When the server rejects ECH, the client completes the handshake with the outer ClientHello and authenticates the server against the ECH config's public_name. At the end of the handshake, start_traffic() encrypts and queues any plaintext buffered by ClientConnection::writer(). It does this *before* checking for EchStatus::Rejected and queueing the ech_required alert.

The application then receives Error::PeerIncompatible(ServerRejectedEncryptedClientHello), as expected. However, the client is still expected to call write_tls() to send the fatal alert, and that call also sends the encrypted application data. The server decrypts the data and only then receives the alert.

The ordering bug is older than 0.23.44. Before 0.23.44, the client checked the server certificate against the inner server name rather than public_name, so a correctly configured server failed certificate verification first and no data was sent. 0.23.44 fixed that check, which makes the ordinary rejection path reachable.

Impact

Plaintext meant for the inner server, the one named in the encrypted ClientHello, goes to the client-facing server identified by public_name. That server is properly authenticated, so this is not an attack by an unauthenticated party. However this violates RFC 9849, which says the following:

  • Section 6.1.6: if the handshake and authentication succeed after ECH rejection, the client "MUST ... abort the connection with an "ech_required" alert before sending any application data to the server."
  • Section 6.1.7: the certificate is checked only against public_name, and the connection "MUST NOT" be reported as successful to the application. rustls does report failure correctly. The problem is only that data is sent before the alert.

This affects only clients that meet all of these conditions:

  • They use EchMode::Enable. GREASE ECH is not affected.
  • They write application data before the handshake completes.
  • They connect to a server that rejects their ECH config, for example because the config is stale. This is the same case where the server returns retry configs.

The usual client response to rejection is to retry with the server's retry configs. In that case, the data has already gone to the outer server.

Text from GitHub Advisory Database

Affected versions 4

  • rustls, rust>= 0.23.44, < 0.23.46GitHub
  • rustls, rust>= 0.24.0-dev.1, < 0.24.0-dev.2GitHub
  • rustls, crates.iofrom 0.23.44, fixed in 0.23.46OSV
  • rustls, crates.iofrom 0.24.0-dev.1, fixed in 0.24.0-dev.2OSV

References 9