All vulnerabilities
GHSA-8w8g-wq8h-fq33CVE-2026-114096

Dulwich: Symlink write-through in checkout(paths=[]) via raw os.open bypasses all symlink protections

dulwichpipLibraries & packages
CVSS
8.6High
ExploitationNo known exploitationNot in CISA KEV, which does not prove it is unexploitedCISA KEV
Exploit odds (EPSS)No scoreNo FIRST EPSS score in this snapshot yet
Fixed in1.2.8Fixed versionGitHub
Published2 Oct 2026Updated 21 Oct 2026GitHub

What fixes it

  • 1.2.8dulwich, pipGitHub
  • 1.2.8dulwich, PyPIOSVpip install "dulwich>=1.2.8"

A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.

Description

Summary

Dulwich's porcelain.checkout(paths=[...]) code path writes files using raw os.open(file_path, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, mode) followed by f.write(obj.data). This code path does NOT call build_file_from_blob() at all, completely bypassing any symlink protections (including the unreleased d09f8af fix). os.open without O_NOFOLLOW follows symlinks at both the target file and intermediate directories, allowing arbitrary file writes.

Root Cause

At dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:5661-5675, the checkout(paths=[...]) implementation:

file_path = _checked_worktree_path(r, path)
os.makedirs(os.path.dirname(file_path), exist_ok=True)
flags = os.O_WRONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_TRUNC
with os.fdopen(os.open(file_path, flags, mode), "wb") as f:
    f.write(obj.data)

_checked_worktree_path() (line 601-631) only performs name validation — checking that the path doesn't start with / or \\ and that components pass INVALID_DOTNAMES checks. It performs zero filesystem symlink detection.

Impact

An attacker can craft a malicious repository that, when a victim clones it and runs checkout(paths=[...]), writes attacker-controlled content (with attacker-controlled permissions) to any filesystem location accessible to the user. Writing to .git/hooks/post-checkout achieves RCE on the next git checkout.

Attack Scenario

  1. Attacker creates a repository where HEAD has trigger as a symlink (mode 120000, content ../../.git/hooks/post-checkout), and tag v1.0 has trigger as an executable file (mode 100755, content #!/bin/sh\nmalicious_payload)
  2. Victim clones the repository — worktree has trigger → ../../.git/hooks/post-checkout (a symlink)
  3. Victim runs porcelain.checkout(repo, target="v1.0", paths=["trigger"]) to restore a specific file from a tag
  4. _checked_worktree_path(r, "trigger") passes — name validation only, no symlink check
  5. os.open("trigger", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0o755) follows the symlink → opens .git/hooks/post-checkout for writing
  6. f.write(obj.data) writes the malicious payload to the hook
  7. Next checkout operation triggers the hook → RCE

Suggested Fix

Replace the raw os.open path with a call to build_file_from_blob (once that function is hardened against intermediate symlinks), or add explicit symlink detection: resolve the path with os.path.realpath() and verify it stays within the worktree root before opening.

Reported by zx (Jace)

Text from GitHub Advisory Database

Affected versions 26

  • dulwich, pip>= 0.24.0, <= 1.2.7GitHub
  • dulwich, PyPIfrom 0.24.0, fixed in 1.2.8OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.0OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.1OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.10OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.2OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.3OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.4OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.5OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.6OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.7OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.8OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.24.9OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.25.0OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.25.1OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI0.25.2OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.0.0OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.1.0OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.0OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.1OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.2OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.3OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.4OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.5OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.6OSV
  • dulwich, PyPI1.2.7OSV

References 4