All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-92945GHSA-7q3f-wx44-378m

vm2: External module allowlist uses a raw prefix test, so a prefix-sharing sibling package is treated as allowlisted

patriksimek vm2npmLibraries & packages
CVSS
4.2Medium
ExploitationNo known exploitationNot in CISA KEV, which does not prove it is unexploitedCISA KEV
Exploit odds (EPSS)0.28%Chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 19% of CVEs. Scored 23 Oct 2026FIRST EPSS
Fixed in3.11.7Fixed versionGitHub
Published17 Sep 2026Updated 1 Oct 2026CVE List

What fixes it

A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.

Description

Summary

isPathAllowedForModule decides whether a resolved path belongs to an allowlisted external module using a raw string prefix test. node_modules/foo2 starts with node_modules/foo, so a package whose name merely shares a prefix with an allowlisted one is treated as being inside it, and a relative require from the allowlisted package reaches it even with transitive loading disabled.

Where it is

lib/resolver-compat.js, lines 122 to 132, quoted from HEAD 7a1f5100b96f48d34e0fe104ab37c0acc5944f92:

isPathAllowedForModule(path, mod) {
    if (!super.isPathAllowed(path)) return false;
    if (mod) {
        if (mod.allowTransitive) return true;
        if (path.startsWith(mod.path)) {
            const rem = path.slice(mod.path.length);
            if (!/(?:^|[\\/])node_modules(?:$|[\\/])/.test(rem)) return true;
        }
    }
    return this.externals.some(regex => regex.test(path));
}

With mod.path of .../node_modules/foo and a resolved path of .../node_modules/foo2/index.js, startsWith is true and rem is 2/index.js, which contains no node_modules segment, so the function returns true.

The node_modules test in rem is what stops a genuine transitive dependency from slipping through. It does not stop a sibling, because a sibling's remainder never contains that segment.

Impact

Code running in NodeVM under an external module allowlist with transitive: false can reach a package that was not allowlisted, provided an allowlisted package performs a relative require to a prefix-sharing sibling.

Two preconditions are worth stating plainly rather than leaving implicit. The deployment must already have such a package layout, and an allowlisted package must have a reachable code path that does the relative require. This is not something the attacker creates; it is something they find. That narrows it considerably, and it is why I have not scored it higher.

Reachability

NodeVM.run at lib/nodevm.js:506 executes the script. require comes from createRequireForModule at lib/setup-node-sandbox.js:168-172 and reaches the resolver callback at lib/nodevm.js:380-384. LegacyResolver.resolveFull at lib/resolver-compat.js:145-160 sets currMod for direct requires, the relative specifier resolves through DefaultResolver.resolveFull and tryFile at lib/resolver.js:327-330, and the authorization decision lands on the function above.

Suggested fix

Require a separator after the prefix, so a sibling cannot match:

if (path === mod.path || path.startsWith(mod.path + path.sep)) {

That is the same anchoring the rem regex already applies to node_modules, applied one level earlier.

Text from GitHub Advisory Database

Affected versions 4

  • vm2, npm<= 3.11.6GitHub
  • vm2affected: all versions before 3.11.7CVE List
  • vm2unaffected: 3.11.7CVE List
  • vm2, npmfrom first release, fixed in 3.11.7OSV

References 6