All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-67220GHSA-r3qr-4h63-mvj2

rabbitmq-server: RabbitMQ: JMS topic exchange erl_scan atom exhaustion

rabbitmq rabbitmq-server
Open in ThreatlineRecord JSON
CVSS
6.0Medium
ExploitationNo known exploitationNot in CISA KEV, which does not prove it is unexploitedCISA KEV
Exploit odds (EPSS)0.31%Chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 23% of CVEs. Scored 23 Oct 2026FIRST EPSS
Fixed inNone listedNo source names a fixed version. Check the vendor advisory below
Published23 Sep 2026Updated 24 Sep 2026CVE List

What fixes it

No source in this snapshot names a fixed version. The vendor advisories under References are the place to check.

Description

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0, When a binding is created on an x-jms-topic exchange, add_binding/3 reads the rjms_erlang_selector argument and passes it through erl_scan:string/1 then erl_parse:parse_term/1. erl_scan:string/1 interns every atom literal it tokenizes. validate_binding/2 is a no-op (-> ok.), there is no length cap, and the surrounding try/catch cannot reclaim atoms. The Java JMS client compiles selectors client-side, but the server does not enforce this , a raw AMQP client can send arbitrary selector strings. An authenticated low-privilege AMQP user confined to one vhost can crash the entire broker node (cross-tenant DoS) in <100 bind calls. Preconditions include rabbitmq_jms_topic_exchange plugin enabled (bundled; required for any JMS deployment) Authenticated AMQP user with read on an x-jms-topic exchange + write on a queue (or configure to declare both). This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, 4.3.0.

Text from CVE List

Affected versions 4

  • rabbitmq-serveraffected: >= 3.13.0, < 3.13.15CVE List
  • rabbitmq-serveraffected: >= 4.0.0, < 4.0.20CVE List
  • rabbitmq-serveraffected: >= 4.1.0, < 4.1.11CVE List
  • rabbitmq-serveraffected: >= 4.2.0, < 4.2.6CVE List

References 2