All vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-107808GHSA-45gv-9wjv-xh7pGO-2026-6704

github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI: Nginx UI: Authentication bypass: password login does not enforce a passkey-only second factor (2FA bypass)

0xJacky github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UIgoWeb servers
CVSS
8.1High
ExploitationPublic exploit codeCISA's assessment says proof of concept code is public, assessed 9 Oct 2026. Not in the KEV catalogCISA via CVE List
Exploit odds (EPSS)0.41%Chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, higher than 34% of CVEs. Scored 23 Oct 2026FIRST EPSS
Fixed in1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814Fixed versionGitHub
Published9 Oct 2026Updated 19 Oct 2026CVE List

What fixes it

  • 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, goGitHubgo get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814
  • 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, GoOSVgo get github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI@v1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814

A fixed version on one release line is not the upgrade target for every line. Check your exact version and any vendor backports.

Description

Summary

nginx-ui supports two second-factor methods — TOTP (OTP) and WebAuthn passkeys — and reports an account as 2FA-enabled when either is configured. However, the password login endpoint (POST /api/login) only enforces a second factor when a TOTP secret is present. An account that has registered a passkey but no TOTP is logged in after password verification alone — the passkey is never requested. This silently downgrades a passkey-protected account to single-factor (password-only) authentication.

Details

The account's 2FA policy treats passkeys as a valid factor (model/user.go):

func (u *User) EnabledOTP() bool     { return len(u.OTPSecret) != 0 }
func (u *User) EnabledPasskey() bool { /* true if a passkey row exists */ }
func (u *User) Enabled2FA() bool     { return u.EnabledOTP() || u.EnabledPasskey() }

func (u *User) AfterFind(_ *gorm.DB) error {
    u.EnabledTwoFA = u.Enabled2FA() // exposed to the UI as `enabled_2fa`
    return nil
}

But the login handler only checks EnabledOTP() (api/user/auth.go, Login):

u, err := user.Login(json.Name, json.Password)
...
if u.EnabledOTP() {                       // <-- only TOTP is enforced
    if json.OTP == "" && json.RecoveryCode == "" {
        c.JSON(http.StatusOK, LoginResponse{Message: "The user has enabled 2FA", Code: Enabled2FA}) // 199
        user.BanIP(clientIP)
        return
    }
    if _, err = user.VerifyOTP(u, json.OTP, json.RecoveryCode); err != nil { /* ... */ }
    secureSessionID = user.SetSecureSessionID(u.ID)
}

// Passkey-only accounts fall through to here and receive a full session token:
accessToken, err := user.GenerateJWT(u)

No branch requires a WebAuthn assertion during password login when EnabledPasskey() is true. The root cause is the mismatch between the policy definition (Enabled2FA() = OTP or passkey) and the enforcement check (EnabledOTP() only).

The same EnabledOTP()-only gating in RequireSecureSession() (internal/middleware/secure_session.go) means passkey-only users are also exempted from step-up on sensitive actions.

Proof of Concept

Tested against nginx-ui built from source (go build -tags unembed) on 127.0.0.1:9000, with WebAuthn configured and a victim account that has a registered passkey and no TOTP. The vulnerable code is identical on the production main branch (api/user/auth.go Login gates on u.EnabledOTP() only; verified at commit 6c86e5a, 2026-05-17).

Account state advertised by GET /api/2fa_status:

{"enabled":true,"otp_status":false,"passkey_status":true, ...}

Attacker logs in with password only (POST /api/login, encrypted params as the client normally sends):

HTTP 200
{"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...."}

code: 200 + a valid JWT = an authenticated session, with the passkey never used. For comparison, the identical account with a TOTP secret instead correctly returns the second-factor challenge:

HTTP 200
{"message":"The user has enabled 2FA","code":199}

| Account state | POST /api/login (password only) | |---|---| | Passkey registered, no TOTP | code 200 + JWT — 2FA NOT enforced | | TOTP registered | code 199 — 2FA challenge enforced |

This isolates the defect: the login path enforces OTP but ignores passkeys.

Impact

  • Any account protected only by a passkey is reduced to password-only

authentication. An attacker who obtains the password (phishing, reuse, leak) gains full access despite the registered security key.

  • In nginx-ui all authenticated users are effectively administrators and the

terminal feature grants a host shell, so account takeover leads to full control of the managed nginx instance / host.

  • Users are given a false sense of security: the UI shows the account as

2FA-enabled while the second factor is not enforced at login.

Remediation

  • Gate the second-factor decision on u.Enabled2FA() (not u.EnabledOTP()) in

Login, in both SSO callbacks, and in RequireSecureSession().

  • For a passkey-only user logging in with a password, return a

"passkey assertion required" challenge and complete login only after a successful WebAuthn assertion (the begin_passkey_login / finish_passkey_login flow already exists and should be required as the second step).

  • Centralize session-token issuance so no login entry point can skip the 2FA

decision.

Affected components

  • api/user/auth.go — Login
  • model/user.go — EnabledOTP, EnabledPasskey, Enabled2FA, AfterFind
  • api/user/2fa.go — get2FAStatus
  • internal/middleware/secure_session.go — RequireSecureSession

Text from GitHub Advisory Database

Affected versions 3

  • github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, go>= 1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1, < 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814GitHub
  • nginx-uiaffected: >= 2.0.0, < 2.5.0CVE List
  • github.com/0xJacky/Nginx-UI, Gofrom 1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1, fixed in 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814OSV

References 4